| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/02/2017 |
|
Autoria: |
VARELA-ORTEGA, C.; BLANO, I.; MANNERS, R.; ESTEVE, P.; TARQUIS, A.; BARRIOS, L.; MARTORANO, L.; ASCARRUNZ, N.; TOLEDO, M.; SIMÕES, M.; SOTTA, E. |
|
Afiliação: |
Consuelo Varela-Ortega; IRENE BLANCO; Rhys Manners; Paloma Esteve; Ana Tarquis; Laura Barrios; LUCIETA GUERREIRO MARTORANO, CPATU; Nataly Ascarrunz; Marisol Toledo; MARGARETH GONCALVES SIMOES, CNPS; ELENEIDE DOFF SOTTA, CPAF-AP. |
|
Título: |
D.3.1.4: Identifying options for integrating biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation: A multi-scale perspective. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
[S.l.]: ROBIN consortium, 2015. |
|
Páginas: |
180 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Project name (GA number): ROBIN (283093). |
|
Conteúdo: |
This deliverable, (D3.1.4) is the last deliverable in a series of deliverables that have responded to these broad objectives of the WP. Specifically, this deliverable presents a multi-scale approach to said objectives of the WP by presenting: 1) the participatory development of policy options selected by stakeholders in participatory stakeholder workshops, 2) a bio-economic modelling approach assessing potential policy options for forest conservation and climate change mitigation in agro-ecosystems at the provincial level, and 3) an analysis of drivers of deforestation at the national scale in Latin America and the Caribbean. Using this multi-scalar approach this document will develop a suite of options that could be developed and used by decision makers to integrate biodiversity and ecosystems in climate change mitigation. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Conservação; Mudança Climática. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/154838/1/ROBIN-D3.1.4-Methods-and-results-from-the-third-round-of-stakeholder-meetings.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01679nam a2200289 a 4500
001 2062869
005 2017-02-06
008 2015 bl uuuu t 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aVARELA-ORTEGA, C.
245 $aD.3.1.4$bIdentifying options for integrating biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation: A multi-scale perspective.$h[electronic resource]
260 $a[S.l.]: ROBIN consortium$c2015
300 $a180 p.
500 $aProject name (GA number): ROBIN (283093).
520 $aThis deliverable, (D3.1.4) is the last deliverable in a series of deliverables that have responded to these broad objectives of the WP. Specifically, this deliverable presents a multi-scale approach to said objectives of the WP by presenting: 1) the participatory development of policy options selected by stakeholders in participatory stakeholder workshops, 2) a bio-economic modelling approach assessing potential policy options for forest conservation and climate change mitigation in agro-ecosystems at the provincial level, and 3) an analysis of drivers of deforestation at the national scale in Latin America and the Caribbean. Using this multi-scalar approach this document will develop a suite of options that could be developed and used by decision makers to integrate biodiversity and ecosystems in climate change mitigation.
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aConservação
650 $aMudança Climática
700 1 $aBLANO, I.
700 1 $aMANNERS, R.
700 1 $aESTEVE, P.
700 1 $aTARQUIS, A.
700 1 $aBARRIOS, L.
700 1 $aMARTORANO, L.
700 1 $aASCARRUNZ, N.
700 1 $aTOLEDO, M.
700 1 $aSIMÕES, M.
700 1 $aSOTTA, E.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/10/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
FIORENTINI, G.; CARVALHO, I. P. C.; MESSANA, J. D.; CASTAGNINO, P. S.; BERNDT, A.; CANESIN, R. C.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; BERCHIELLI, T. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
G. FIORENTINI, São Paulo State University; I. P. C. CARVALHO, São Paulo State University; J. D. MESSANA, São Paulo State University; P. S. CASTAGNINO, São Paulo State University; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; R. C. CANESIN, São Paulo State University; ROSA TOYOKO SHIRAISHI FRIGHETTO, CNPMA; T. T. BERCHIELLI, São Paulo State University. |
|
Título: |
Effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Animal Science, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1613-1620, apr. 2014. |
|
DOI: |
10.2527/jas.2013-6868 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compared to animals that were fed the other diets. Therefore, PO compared to the other lipid sources used in this study reduces intake, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass yield. Therefore, PO is not suggested for feedlot-finished animals. MenosThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compare... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Emissão de metano; Fat whole soybeans; Intake; Oil palm; Oil protected. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado nelore; Linhaça; Metano; Novilho; Nutrição animal; Óleo vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Fatty acids; linseed; Linseed oil; Methane; Palm oils; Protected fat; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02962naa a2200433 a 4500
001 2003775
005 2023-03-29
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2013-6868$2DOI
100 1 $aFIORENTINI, G.
245 $aEffect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and methane emissions of feedlot Nellore steers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aThe present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lipids with different fatty acid profiles on the intake, performance, and enteric CH4 emission of Nellore steers. A total of 45 Nellore animals with an average initial BW of 419 ± 11 kg (at 15 ± 2 mo) were distributed in a completely randomized design consisting of 5 treatments and 9 replicates. The roughage feed was maize silage (600 g/kg on a DM basis) plus concentrate (400 g/kg on a DM basis). The dietary treatments were as follows: without additional fat (WF), palm oil (PO), linseed oil (LO), protected fat (PF; Lactoplus), and whole soybeans (WS). The lipid source significantly affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake. The greatest intakes of DM, OM, and CP were observed in the animals that were fed the WF or PF diets, and the lowest intakes were observed in the animals that were fed the PO diet. Intake of NDF decreased (P < 0.05) with the addition of PO. Enteric methane emission (g/kg DMI) was reduced by an average of 30% when the animals were fed diets containing WS, LO, and PO (P < 0.05), and these diets caused a larger reduction in the energy loss in the form of methane compared to those without added fat and with added PF (3.3 vs. 4.7%). The different fatty acid profiles did not affect the backfat thickness or the loin eye area of the animals (P > 0.05). However, animals fed PO displayed lower daily weight gain (0.36 kg/d), feed efficiency (0.08 kg ADG/kg DM), HCW (245 kg), and hot yield percentage (52.6%) compared to animals that were fed the other diets. Therefore, PO compared to the other lipid sources used in this study reduces intake, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass yield. Therefore, PO is not suggested for feedlot-finished animals.
650 $aFatty acids
650 $alinseed
650 $aLinseed oil
650 $aMethane
650 $aPalm oils
650 $aProtected fat
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aGado nelore
650 $aLinhaça
650 $aMetano
650 $aNovilho
650 $aNutrição animal
650 $aÓleo vegetal
653 $aEmissão de metano
653 $aFat whole soybeans
653 $aIntake
653 $aOil palm
653 $aOil protected
700 1 $aCARVALHO, I. P. C.
700 1 $aMESSANA, J. D.
700 1 $aCASTAGNINO, P. S.
700 1 $aBERNDT, A.
700 1 $aCANESIN, R. C.
700 1 $aFRIGHETTO, R. T. S.
700 1 $aBERCHIELLI, T. T.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science$gv. 92, n. 4, p. 1613-1620, apr. 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
